Toni Egbert Naturist Law Library - © NEF
State Supreme Courts
A selection of cases with significance to naturists, considered by various State Supreme Courts. Cases will be added as they become available.
California
IN RE CHAD MERRILL SMITH on Habeas Corpus
[In re Smith , 7 Cal.3d 362]
Supreme Court of California.
Crim. No. 15986. June 13, 1972
PRYOR v. MUNICIPAL COURT
[Pryor v. Municipal Court (1979) 25 C3d 238]
Superior Court of California
September 7, 1979
Florida
LISA HOFFMAN v. DALE CARSON
Supreme Court of Florida
1971.FL.41628; 250 So. 2d 891
July 7, 1971
REBECCA M. CHESEBROUGH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Supreme Court of Florida
1971.FL.42639; 255 So. 2d 675
December 8, 1971
Hawaii
STATE OF HAWAII v. MAIIKA K. KALAMA
In the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii
NO. 22457 September 29, 2000
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion by Ramil, J.
STATE OF HAWAII v. FRANCES E. MILFORD, et al.
In the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii
NO. 22489 September 29, 2000
Opinion of the Court
Idaho
STATE OF IDAHO v. RAYMOND LLOYD MORTON
In the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho
Docket No. 29698, May 21, 2004
Massachusetts
COMMONWEALTH (OF MASSACHUSETTS) vs. JOHN C. BEAN.
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Docket no. SJC-08522
November 8, 2001. - January 28, 2002.
Michigan
PEOPLE OF THE STATE MICHIGAN v. EARL HILDABRIDLE
Supreme Court of Michigan
Docket Nos. 85-88, September 9, 1958
1958.MI.193, 92 N.W.2d 6, 353 Mich. 562
Missouri
MICHAEL OCELLO, et al. v. CHRIS KOSTER, in his official capacity as Missouri Attorney General
Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc
No. SC91563
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cole County, The Honorable Jon E. Beetem, Judge
Nebraska
VILLAGE OF WINSLOW v. SHEETS dba CAFE 77
Supreme Court of Nebraska
No. S-99-1224 Filed February 9, 2001.
Nevada
STATE v. CASTANEDA
126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 45
November 24, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
No. 52911
New York
NEW YORK v. SANTORELLI et al.
Court of Appeals of New York.
80 N.Y.2d 875, 600 N.E.2d 232
July 7, 1992. Opinion and Memorandum
North Carolina
NORTH CAROLINA v. FLY
348 N.C. 556, 501 S.E.2d 656 (N.C. 07/09/1998)
North Carolina Supreme Court
No. 472A97
348 N.C. 556, 501 S.E.2d 656, 1998.NC.18063
July 09, 1998
Pennsylvania
PAP’S v. ERIE et al. (2002)
In the Supreme Court of Pannsylvania, Western District
Remand from the United States Supreme Court entered on
March 29, 2000, at No. 98-1161, 529 U.S. 277 (2000)
[J-159-2000] Decision December 19, 2002
South Dakota
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA v. PLENTY HORSE
In the Supreme Court of the State of South Dakota
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit,
Minnehaha County, South Dakota
#24370-r-JKK 2007 SD 114
Considered on briefs August 27, 2007, OPINION FILED 11/07/07
Texas
DAVID LACOUR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
On the State’s Petition for Discretionary Review
From the Ninth Court of Appeals, Jefferson County
NO. 1911-98 OPINION CONCURRING OPINION
VALORIE W. DAVENPORT v. THE HONORABLE CAROLYN GARCIA
SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
On petition for writ of mandamus to the 151st Judicial District Court
of Harris County, Texas June 17, 1992, Delivered
No. D-1558 OPINION | CONCURRING OPINION
Washington
CITY OF SEATTLE, RESPONDENT v. KELLY ANN BUCHANAN et al., APPELLANTS
90 Wash. 2d 584, 584 P.2d 918 (Wa. 09/28/1978)
SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
Case No.: 44199
En Banc. Rosellini, J. Wright, C.j., and Hamilton, Stafford, and Hicks, JJ., concur. Wright, C.j., and Hicks, J., concur by separate opinion; Utter, Horowitz, Brachtenbach, and Dolliver, JJ., dissent by separate opinions.
Wisconsin
STATE OF WISCONSIN v. SCOTT L. STEVENSON
236 Wis.2d 86, 236 Wis.2d 86, 613 N.W.2d 90, 613 N.W.2d 90, 2000 WI 71 (Wis. 06/28/2000)
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
Case No.: 98-2110-CR
ON CERTIFICATION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS
Oral Argument: February 10, 2000
June 28, 2000
